Central Network System for Sharjah Government Organizations Research Paper

Central Net hightail it System for Sharjah Government Organizations - Research Paper specimenImplementation of a unfermented governance in an organization will lead to requirement of refreshing skills, change in communication pattern, modification of work relationships, reporting responsibilities and roles, redefinition of points of control and authority, a shift in data ownership, increased security and privacy concerns and change in organizational structures and younger management skills. Therefore, the effects of system effectuation need to be evaluated before a concrete decision is made. This document presents a review of system implementation methods, implementation strategies, and discusses the pros and cons on the implementation of Central Network Systems for Sharjah Government Organization on different government departments and authorities. System Implementation System Implementation is the fourth stage of the system ripening process where the needed information syste m is coded, tested, debugged, installed then supported. There are many factors to be considered prior to the choice of an implementation method, appropriate for a new software system. ... The procedure buttocks be followed in a linear pattern being that it is a structured plan. The existence of an implementation procedure idler let the involved team know all the conditions to be met at a given step before moving to the next step. The method or procedure of implementation should ensure that all possible risks are identified and counteracted efficiently. Below are examples of the system implementation methods i) Direct Change Over The erstwhile(a) system is stopped at once then the new system is started. Every data initially fed into the old system now goes into the new system. This method is fit for highly centralized and small organizations with excellent ability to handle change. One advantage of this method is that it takes minimal effort and time and the users can feel the effe ct of the new system within a short time. One flaw is that failure of the new system can be a huge set back since there will be no back up. ii) Parallel Running In this method both the old and the new system are left running side by side during which the data fed into the old system is also fed into the new system. In the end, the old system is dropped but only after a proof that the new system is working well. Familiarity with change and good organization are thorough for a business enterprise wishing to use the parallel method of system implementation. The method has the benefit that the old system can serve as backup in the event of failure of the new system. Also, the outputs of the two systems can be compared and this could be useful in evaluating the success level of the newly implemented system. One challenge with this plan is that a lot of time and effort will be spent in running the two systems concurrently. iii) Phased